Category Archives: inhibits VEGF

Luteolin

Cancer: Colorectal., pancreatic, ovarian, breast

Action: Anti-inflammatory, radio-protective, TAM chemo-sensitizer

Luteolin is a flavonoid found in many plants and foods, including Terminalia chebula (Retz.), Prunella vulgaris (L.) and Perilla frutescens [(L.) Britton].

Luteolin is contained in Ocimum sanctum L. or Ocimum tenuiflorum L, commonly known as Holy Basil in English or Tulsi in various Indian languages; it is an important medicinal plant in the various traditional and folk systems of medicine in Southeast Asia. Scientific studies have shown it to possess anti-inflammatory, anti-analgesic, anti-pyretic, anti-diabetic, hepato-protective, hypolipidemic, anti-stress, and immunomodulatory activities. It has been found to prevent chemical-induced skin, liver, oral., and lung cancers and mediates these effects by increasing the anti-oxidant activity, altering the gene expressions, inducing apoptosis, and inhibiting angiogenesis and metastasis.

Radio-protective

The aqueous extract of Tulsi has been shown to protect mice against γ-radiation-induced sickness and mortality and to selectively protect the normal tissues against the tumoricidal effects of radiation. The chemo-preventive and radio-protective properties of Tulsi emphasize aspects that warrant future research to establish its activity and utility in cancer prevention and treatment (Baliga et al., 2013).

Anti-inflammatory

Pre-treatment of RAW 264.7 with luteolin, luteolin-7-glucoside, quercetin, and the isoflavonoid genistein inhibited both the LPS-stimulated TNF-αand interleukin-6 release, whereas eriodictyol and hesperetin only inhibited TNF-αrelease. From the compounds tested luteolin and quercetin were the most potent in inhibiting cytokine production with an IC50 of less than 1 and 5 µM for TNF-αrelease, respectively. Pre-treatment of the cells with luteolin attenuated LPS-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of many discrete proteins. Luteolin inhibited LPS-induced phosphorylation of Akt. Treatment of macrophages with LPS resulted in increased IκB-αphosphorylation and reduced the levels of IκB-α. It was concluded that luteolin inhibits protein tyrosine phosphorylation, nuclear factor-κB-mediated gene expression and pro-inflammatory cytokine production in murine macrophages (Xagorari et al., 2001).

Luteolin (Lut) possesses significant anti-inflammatory activity in well established models of acute and chronic inflammation, such as xylene-induced ear edema in mice (ED50= 107 mg/ kg), carrageenin-induced swellingof the ankle, acetic acid-induced pleurisy and croton oil-induced gaseous pouch granuloma in rats. Its combined immunostimulatory and anti-inflammatory activity, and inhibitory effect upon immediate hypersensitive response provide the pharmacologic bases for the beneficial effects of Lut in the treatment of chronic bronchitis (Chen et al., 1986).

Anti-inflammatory; Lung

Luteolin dose-dependently inhibited the expression and production of nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), as well as the expression of inducible NO synthase (iNOS), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and interleukin-6 (IL-6). Luteolin also reduced the DNA binding activity of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) in LPS-activated macrophages. Moreover, luteolin blocked the degradation of IκB-α and nuclear translocation of NF-κB p65 subunit.

In sum, these data suggest that, by blocking NF-κ>B and AP-1 activation, luteolin acts to suppress the LPS-elicited inflammatory events in mouse alveolar macrophages, and this effect was mediated, at least in part, by inhibiting the generation of reactive oxygen species. These observations suggest a possible therapeutic application of this agent for treating inflammatory disorders in the lung (Chen et al., 2007).

Anti-inflammatory; Neuroinflammation

Pre-treatment of primary murine microglia and BV-2 microglial cells with luteolin inhibited LPS-stimulated IL-6 production at both the mRNA and protein levels. Whereas luteolin had no effect on the LPS-induced increase in NF-κB DNA binding activity, it markedly reduced AP-1 transcription factor binding activity. To determine whether luteolin might have similar effects in vivo, mice were provided drinking water supplemented with luteolin for 21 days and then they were injected i.p. with LPS. Luteolin consumption reduced LPS-induced IL-6 in plasma 4 hours after injection. Taken together, these data suggest luteolin inhibits LPS-induced IL-6 production in the brain by inhibiting the JNK signaling pathway and activation of AP-1 in microglia. Thus, luteolin may be useful for mitigating neuroinflammation (Jang et al., 2008).

Colon Cancer

Activities of CDK4 and CDK2 decreased within 2 hours after luteolin treatment, with a 38% decrease in CDK2 activity (P < 0.05) observed in cells treated with 40 µmol/l luteolin. Luteolin inhibited CDK2 activity in a cell-free system, suggesting that it directly inhibits CDK2.

tLuteolin promoted G2/M arrest at 24 hours post-treatment  by down-regulating cyclin B1 expression and inhibiting cell division cycle (CDC)2 activity. Luteolin promoted apoptosis with increased activation of caspases 3, 7, and 9 and enhanced poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase cleavage and decreased expression of p21CIP1/WAF1, survivin, Mcl-1, Bcl-xL, and Mdm-2. Decreased expression of these key antiapoptotic proteins could contribute to the increase in p53-independent apoptosis that was observed in HT-29 cells. Lim et al., (2007) demonstrated that luteolin promotes both cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis in the HT-29 colon cancer cell line, providing insight about the mechanisms underlying its anti-tumorigenic activities.

Pancreatic Cancer; Chemotherapy

Simultaneous treatment or pre-treatment (0, 6, 24 and 42 hours) of flavonoids and chemotherapeutic drugs and various concentrations (0-50µM) were assessed using the MTS cell proliferation assay. Simultaneous treatment with either flavonoid (0,13, 25 or 50µM) and chemotherapeutic drugs 5-fluorouracil (5-FU, 50µM) or gemcitabine (Gem, 10µM) for 60h resulted in less-than-additive effect (p<0.05). Pre-treatment for 24 hours with 13µM of either Api or Lut, followed by Gem for 36 hours was optimal to inhibit cell proliferation.

Pre-treatment of cells with 11-19µM of either flavonoid for 24 hours resulted in 59-73% growth inhibition when followed by Gem (10µM, 36h). Lut (15µM, 24h) Pre-treatment followed by Gem (10µM, 36h), significantly decreased protein expression of nuclear GSK-3βand NF-κB p65 and increased pro-apoptotic cytosolic cytochrome c. Pre-treatment of human pancreatic cancer cells BxPC-3 with low concentrations of Lut effectively aid in the anti-proliferative activity of chemotherapeutic drugs (Johnson et al., 2013).

Ovarian Cancer

Luteolin has been found to repress NF-kappaB (NF-κ>B, a pro-inflammatory transcription factor) and inhibit pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-αand IL-6. Additionally, it has been shown to stabilize p53 protein, sensitize TRAIL (TNF receptor apoptosis-inducing ligand) induced apoptosis, and prevent or delay chemotherapy-resistance.

Recent studies further indicate that luteolin potently inhibits VEGF production and suppresses ovarian cancer cell metastasis in vitro. Lastly, oridonin and wogonin were suggested to suppress ovarian CSCs as is reflected by down-regulation of the surface marker EpCAM. Unlike NSAIDS (non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs), well documented clinical data for phyto-active compounds are lacking. In order to evaluate objectively the potential benefit of these compounds in the treatment of ovarian cancer, strategically designed, large scale studies are warranted (Chen et al., 2012).

Chemo-sensitizer

The sensitization effect of luteolin on cisplatin-induced apoptosis is p53 dependent, as such effect is only found in p53 wild-type cancer cells but not in p53 mutant cancer cells. Moreover, knockdown of p53 by small interfering RNA made p53 wild-type cancer cells resistant to luteolin and cisplatin. Second, Shi et al., (2007) observed a significant increase of p53 protein level in luteolin-treated cancer cells without increase of p53 mRNA level, indicating the possible effect of luteolin on p53 posttranscriptional regulation.

In summary, data from this study reveal a novel molecular mechanism involved in the anti-cancer effect of luteolin and support its potential clinical application as a chemo-sensitizer in cancer therapy.

Breast Cancer; TAM Chemo-sensitizer

This study found that the level of cyclin E2 (CCNE2) mRNA was higher in tumor cells (4.89-fold, (∗)P=0.005) than in normal paired tissue samples as assessed using real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis (n=257). Further, relatively high levels of CCNE2 protein expression were detected in tamoxifen-resistant (TAM-R) MCF-7 cells.

These results showed that the level of CCNE2 protein expression was specifically inhibited in luteolin-treated (5µM) TAM-R cells, either in the presence or absence of 4-OH-TAM (100nM). Combined treatment with 4-OH-TAM and luteolin synergistically sensitized the TAM-R cells to 4-OH-TAM. The results of this study suggest that luteolin can be used as a chemo-sensitizer to target the expression level of CCNE2 and that it could be a novel strategy to overcome TAM resistance in breast cancer patients (Tu et al., 2013).

References

Baliga MS, Jimmy R, Thilakchand KR, et al. (2013). Ocimum sanctum L (Holy Basil or Tulsi) and its phytochemicals in the prevention and treatment of cancer. Nutr Cancer, 65(1):26-35. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2013.785010.


Chen CY, Peng WH, Tsai KD and Hsu SL. (2007). Luteolin suppresses inflammation-associated gene expression by blocking NF-κB and AP-1 activation pathway in mouse alveolar macrophages. Life Sciences, 81(23-24):1602-1614. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2007.09.028


Chen MZ, Jin WZ, Dai LM, Xu SY. (1986). Effect of luteolin on inflammation and immune function. Chinese Journal of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 1986-01.


Chen SS, Michael A, Butler-Manuel SA. (2012). Advances in the treatment of ovarian cancer: a potential role of anti-inflammatory phytochemicals. Discov Med, 13(68):7-17.


Jang S, Kelley KW, Johnson RW. (2008). Luteolin reduces IL-6 production in microglia by inhibiting JNK phosphorylation and activation of AP-1. PNAS, 105(21):7534-7539


Johnson JL, Gonzalez de Mejia E. (2013). Interactions between dietary flavonoids apigenin or luteolin and chemotherapeutic drugs to potentiate anti-proliferative effect on human pancreatic cancer cells, in vitro. Food Chem Toxicol, S0278-6915(13)00491-2. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2013.07.036.


Lim DY, Jeong Y, Tyner Al., Park JHY. (2007). Induction of cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis in HT-29 human colon cancer cells by the dietary compound luteolin. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, 292: G66-G75. doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00248.2006.


Shi R, Huang Q, Zhu X, et al. (2007). Luteolin sensitizes the anti-cancer effect of cisplatin via c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase-mediated p53 phosphorylation and stabilization. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, 6(4):1338-1347. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0638.


Tu SH, Ho CT, Liu MF, et al. (2013). Luteolin sensitizes drug-resistant human breast cancer cells to tamoxifen via the inhibition of cyclin E2 expression. Food Chem, 141(2):1553-61. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.04.077.


Xagorari A, Papapetropoulos A, Mauromatis A, et al. (2001). Luteolin inhibits an endotoxin-stimulated phosphorylation cascade and pro-inflammatory cytokine production in macrophages. JPET, 296(1):181-187.

Luteolin

Cancer: Colorectal., ovarian, pancreatic

Action: Anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, radio-sensitizer, chemo-sensitizer

Luteolin is a flavonoid found in many plants and foods, including Terminalia chebula (Retz.), Prunella vulgaris (L.) and Perilla frutescens [(L.) Britton].

Luteolin is contained in Ocimum sanctum L . or Ocimum tenuiflorum L , commonly known as Holy Basil in English or Tulsi in various Indian languages, which is an important medicinal plant in the various traditional and folk systems of medicine in Southeast Asia. Scientific studies have shown it to possess anti-inflammatory, analgesic, anti-pyretic, anti-diabetic, hepato-protective, hypolipidemic, anti-stress, and immunomodulatory activities. It has been found to prevent chemical-induced skin, liver, oral., and lung cancers and mediates these effects by increasing the anti-oxidant activity, altering the gene expressions, inducing apoptosis, and inhibiting angiogenesis and metastasis.

Colon Cancer

Luteolin inhibited cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4 and CDK2 activity, resulting in G1 arrest with a concomitant decrease of phosphorylation of retinoblastoma protein. Activities of CDK4 and CDK2 decreased within 2 hours after luteolin treatment, with a 38% decrease in CDK2 activity (P < 0.05) observed in cells treated with 40 µmol/l luteolin. Luteolin also promoted G2/M arrest at 24 hours post-treatment by down-regulating cyclin B1 expression and inhibiting cell division cycle (CDC)2 activity. Luteolin promoted apoptosis with increased activation of caspases 3, 7, and 9 and enhanced poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase cleavage and decreased expression of p21CIP1/WAF1, survivin, Mcl-1, Bcl-xL, and Mdm-2. Lim et al. (2007) demonstrated that luteolin promotes both cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis in the HT-29 colon cancer cell line, providing insight about the mechanisms underlying its anti-tumorigenic activities.

Radio-protective

The aqueous extract of Perilla frutescens has been shown to protect mice against γ-radiation-induced sickness and mortality and to selectively protect the normal tissues against the tumoricidal effects of radiation. The chemo-preventive and radio-protective properties of Perilla emphasize aspects that warrant future research to establish its activity and utility in cancer prevention and treatment (Baliga et al., 2013).

Anti-inflammatory

Pre-treatment of RAW 264.7 macrophages with luteolin, luteolin-7-glucoside, quercetin, and the isoflavonoid genistein inhibited both the LPS-stimulated TNF-α and interleukin-6 release, whereas eriodictyol and hesperetin only inhibited TNF-α release. From the compounds tested, luteolin and quercetin were the most potent in inhibiting cytokine production with an IC50 of less than 1 and 5 µM for TNF-α release, respectively. Moreover, luteolin inhibited LPS-induced phosphorylation of Akt. Treatment of macrophages with LPS resulted in increased IκB-α phosphorylation and reduced the levels of IκB-α. Pre-treatment of cells with luteolin abolished the effects of LPS on IκB-α.

Xagorari et al. (2001) concluded that luteolin inhibits protein tyrosine phosphorylation, nuclear factor-κB-mediated gene expression and pro-inflammatory cytokine production in murine macrophages.

Anti-inflammatory; Neuroinflammation

Pre-treatment of primary murine microglia and BV-2 microglial cells with luteolin inhibited LPS-stimulated IL-6 production at both the mRNA and protein levels. Whereas luteolin had no effect on the LPS-induced increase in NF-κB DNA binding activity, it markedly reduced AP-1 transcription factor binding activity. Consistent with this finding, luteolin did not inhibit LPS-induced degradation of IκB-α but inhibited JNK phosphorylation.

Luteolin consumption reduced LPS-induced IL-6 in plasma 4 hours after injection. Furthermore, luteolin decreased the induction of IL-6 mRNA by LPS in the hippocampus but not in the cortex or cerebellum. Taken together, these data suggest luteolin inhibits LPS-induced IL-6 production in the brain by inhibiting the JNK signaling pathway and activation of AP-1 in microglia. Thus, luteolin may be useful for mitigating neuroinflammation (Jang et al., 2008).

Immunostimulatory and Anti-inflammatory

Luteolin (Lut) possesses significant anti-inflammatory activity in well-established models of acute and chronic inflammation, such as xylene-induced ear edema in mice (ED50= 107 mg/ kg), carrageenin-induced swellingof the ankle, acetic acid-induced pleurisy and croton oil-induced gaseous pouch granuloma in rats. Lut had a marked inhibitory effect on the inflammatory exudation, but did not affect the number of leucocytes. Its combined immunostimulatory and anti-inflammatory activity, and inhibitory effect upon immediate hypersensitive response, provide the pharmacologic bases for the beneficial effects of Lut in the treatment of chronic bronchitis (Chen et al., 1986).

Anti-inflammatory

Luteolin dose-dependently inhibited the expression and production of those inflammatory genes and mediators in macrophages stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Semi-quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay further confirmed the suppression of LPS-induced TNF- α, IL-6, iNOS and COX-2 gene expression by luteolin at a transcriptional level. Luteolin also reduced the DNA binding activity of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) in LPS-activated macrophages.

In addition, luteolin significantly inhibited the LPS-induced DNA binding activity of activating protein-1 (AP-1). It was also found that luteolin attenuated the LPS-mediated protein kinase B (Akt) and IKK phosphorylation, as well as reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. In sum, these data suggest that, by blocking NF-κB and AP-1 activation, luteolin acts to suppress the LPS-elicited inflammatory events in mouse alveolar macrophages, and this effect was mediated, at least in part, by inhibiting the generation of reactive oxygen species. These observations suggest a possible therapeutic application of this agent for treating inflammatory disorders in the lung (Chen et al., 2007).

Pancreatic Cancer; Chemo-enhancing

Simultaneous treatment or pre-treatment (0, 6, 24 and 42h) of flavonoids and chemotherapeutic drugs and various concentrations (0-50µM) were assessed using the MTS cell proliferation assay. Pre-treatment for 24 hours with 13µM of either Apigenin or Luteolin, followed by Gem for 36 h was optimal to inhibit cell proliferation.

Pre-treatment of cells with 11-19µM of either flavonoid for 24 hours resulted in 59%–73% growth inhibition when followed by Gem (10µM, 36 hours). Lut (15µM, 24 hours) pre-treatment followed by Gem (10µM, 36h), significantly decreased protein expression of nuclear GSK-3β and NF-κB p65 and increased pro-apoptotic cytosolic cytochrome c. Pre-treatment of human pancreatic cancer cells BxPC-3 with low concentrations of Lut effectively aid in the anti-proliferative activity of chemotherapeutic drugs (Johnson et al., 2013).

Ovarian Cancer

Recent studies further indicate that luteolin potently inhibits VEGF production and suppresses ovarian cancer cell metastasis in vitro. Lastly, oridonin and wogonin were suggested to suppress ovarian CSCs as is reflected by down-regulation of the surface marker EpCAM.

Unlike NSAIDS (non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs), well-documented clinical data for phyto-active compounds are lacking. In order to evaluate objectively the potential benefit of these compounds in the treatment of ovarian cancer, strategically designed, large scale studies are warranted (Chen et al., 2012).

Chemo-sensitizer

The sensitization effect of luteolin on cisplatin-induced apoptosis is p53 dependent, as such effect is only found in p53 wild-type cancer cells but not in p53 mutant cancer cells. Moreover, knockdown of p53 by small interfering RNA made p53 wild-type cancer cells resistant to luteolin and cisplatin. The critical role of c-Jun NH(2)-terminal kinase (JNK) was identified in regulation of p53 protein stability: luteolin activates JNK, and JNK then stabilizes p53 via phosphorylation, leading to reduced ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation.

An in vivo nude mice xenograft model confirmed that luteolin enhanced the cancer therapeutic activity of cisplatin via p53 stabilization and accumulation. In summary, data from this study reveal a novel molecular mechanism involved in the anti-cancer effects of luteolin and support its potential clinical application as a chemo-sensitizer in cancer therapy (Shi et al., 2007).

Breast Cancer; Chemo-sensitzer

Luteolin is a flavonoid that has been identified in many plant tissues and exhibits chemo-preventive or chemo-sensitizing properties against human breast cancer. However, the oncogenic molecules in human breast cancer cells that are inhibited by luteolin treatment have not been identified.

Relatively high levels of cyclin E2 (CCNE2) protein expression were detected in tamoxifen-resistant (TAM-R) MCF-7 cells. These results showed that the level of CCNE2 protein expression was specifically inhibited in luteolin-treated (5µM) TAM-R cells, either in the presence or absence of 4-OH-TAM (100nM). Combined treatment with 4-OH-TAM and luteolin synergistically sensitized the TAM-R cells to 4-OH-TAM. The results of this study suggest that luteolin can be used as a chemo-sensitizer to target the expression level of CCNE2 and that it could be a novel strategy to overcome TAM resistance in breast cancer patients (Tu et al., 2013).

References

Baliga MS, Jimmy R, Thilakchand KR, et al. (2013). Ocimum sanctum L (Holy Basil or Tulsi) and its phytochemicals in the prevention and treatment of cancer. Nutr Cancer, 65(1):26-35. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2013.785010.

Chen CY, Peng WH, Tsai KD and Hsu SL. (2007). Luteolin suppresses inflammation-associated gene expression by blocking NF- κ B and AP-1 activation pathway in mouse alveolar macrophages. Life Sciences, 81(23-24):1602-1614. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2007.09.028

Chen MZ, Jin WZ, Dai LM, Xu SY. (1986). Effect of luteolin on inflammation and immune function. Chinese Journal of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 1986-01.

Chen SS, Michael A, Butler-Manuel SA. (2012). Advances in the treatment of ovarian cancer: a potential role of anti-inflammatory phytochemicals. Discov Med, 13(68):7-17.

Jang S, Kelley KW, Johnson RW. (2008). Luteolin reduces IL-6 production in microglia by inhibiting JNK phosphorylation and activation of AP-1. PNAS, 105(21):7534-7539

Johnson JL, Gonzalez de Mejia E. (2013). Interactions between dietary flavonoids apigenin or luteolin and chemotherapeutic drugs to potentiate anti-proliferative effect on human pancreatic cancer cells, in vitro. Food Chem Toxicol, S0278-6915(13)00491-2. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2013.07.036.

Lim DY, Jeong Y, Tyner Al., Park JHY. (2007). Induction of cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis in HT-29 human colon cancer cells by the dietary compound luteolin. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, 292: G66-G75. doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00248.2006.

Shi R, Huang Q, Zhu X, et al. (2007). Luteolin sensitizes the anti-cancer effect of cisplatin via c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase-mediated p53 phosphorylation and stabilization. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, 6(4):1338-1347. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0638.

Tu SH, Ho CT, Liu MF, et al. (2013). Luteolin sensitizes drug-resistant human breast cancer cells to tamoxifen via the inhibition of cyclin E2 expression. Food Chem, 141(2):1553-61. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.04.077.

Xagorari A, Papapetropoulos A, Mauromatis A, et al. (2001). Luteolin inhibits an endotoxin-stimulated phosphorylation cascade and pro-inflammatory cytokine production in macrophages. JPET, 296(1):181-187.

Genistein (See also Daidzien)

Cancer:
Breast, kidney, prostate, renal., liver, endometrial., ovarian

Action: Anti-angiogenesis, cell-cycle arrest, cancer stem cells, VEGF, radiotherapy, sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1)

Genistein is a natural isoflavone phytoestrogen present in a number of plants, including soy, fava, and kudzu (Glycine max [(L.) Merr.], Vicia faba (L.), Pueraria lobata [(Willd.) Ohwi]).

Phytoestrogens

Phytoestrogens have been investigated at the epidemiological., clinical and molecular levels to determine their potential health benefits. The two major groups of phytoestrogens, isoflavones and lignans, are abundant in soy products and flax respectively, but are also present in a variety of other foods. It is thought that these estrogen-like compounds may protect against chronic diseases, such as hormone-dependent cancers, cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis (Stark & Madar, 2002).

S-Equol Production and Isoflavone Metabolism

S-Equol and Breast Cancer

Differences in ability to metabolize daidzein to equol might help explain inconsistent findings about isoflavones and breast cancer. Tseng et al. (2013) examined equol-producing status in relation to breast density, a marker of breast cancer risk, and evaluated whether an association of isoflavone intake with breast density differs by equol-producing status in a sample of Chinese immigrant women. In their sample, 30% were classified as equol producers. In adjusted linear regression models, equol producers had significantly lower mean dense tissue area (32.8 vs. 37.7 cm(2), P = 0.03) and lower mean percent breast density (32% vs. 35%, P = 0.03) than nonproducers. Significant inverse associations of isoflavone intake with dense area and percent density were apparent, but only in equol producers (interaction P = 0.05 for both).

Although these findings warrant confirmation in a larger sample, they offer a possible explanation for the inconsistent findings about soy intake and breast density and possibly breast cancer risk as well. The findings further suggest the importance of identifying factors that influence equol-producing status and exploring appropriate targeting of interventions.

S-Equol and Dietary Factors

S-(-)equol, an intestinally derived metabolite of the soy isoflavone daidzein, is proposed to enhance the efficacy of soy diets. Setchell et al. (2013) performed a comprehensive dietary analysis of 143 macro- and micro-nutrients in 159 healthy adults to determine whether the intake of specific nutrients favors equol production. Three-day diet records were collected and analyzed using Nutrition Data System for Research software and S-(-)equol was measured in urine by mass spectrometry.

Equol producers accounted for 29.6% of participants. No significant differences were observed for total protein, carbohydrate, fat, saturated fat, or fiber intakes between equol producers and nonproducers. However, principal component analysis revealed differences in several nutrients, including higher intakes of polyunsaturated fatty acids (P = 0.039), maltose (P = 0.02), and vitamins A (P = 0.01) and E (P = 0.035) and a lower intake of total cholesterol (P = 0.010) in equol producers.

Subtle differences in some nutrients may influence the ability to produce equol.

S-Equol and Dietary Factors; Fats

The soy isoflavones, daidzein and genistein, and the lignans, matairesinol and secoisolariciresinol, are phytoestrogens metabolized extensively by the intestinal microflora. Considerable important evidence is already available that shows extensive interindividual variation in isoflavone metabolism. There was a 16-fold variation in total isoflavonoid excretion in urine after the high-isoflavone treatment period. The variation in urinary equol excretion was greatest (664-fold), and subjects fell into two groups: poor equol excretors and good equol excretors (36%). A significant negative correlation was found between the proportion of energy from fat in the habitual diet and urinary equol excretion (r = -0.55; p = 0.012). Good equol excretors consumed less fat as percentage of energy than poor excretors (26 +/- 2.3% compared with 35 +/- 1.6%, p < 0.01) and more carbohydrate as percentage of energy than poor excretors (55 +/- 2.9% compared with 47 +/- 1.7%, p < 0.05).

It is suggested that the dietary fat intake decreases the capacity of gut microbial flora to synthesize equol (Rowland et al., 2000).

Isoflavones and Fermented Soy Foods

Serum concentrations of total isoflavones after 1–4 hours were significantly higher in the aglycone-rich fermented soybeans (Fsoy) group than in the glucoside-rich non-fermented soybeans (Soy) group. The Fsoy group showed significantly higher maximum concentration (Cmax: 2.79 ± 0.13 vs 1.74 ± 0.13 µmol L(-1) ) and area under the curve (AUC(0-24 h) : 23.78 ± 2.41 vs 19.95 ± 2.03 µmol day L(-1) ) and lower maximum concentration time (Tmax: 1.00 ± 0.00 vs 5.00 ± 0.67 h) compared with the Soy group. The cumulative urinary excretion of total isoflavones after 2 hours was significantly higher in the Fsoy group than in the Soy group. Individual isoflavones (daidzein, genistein and glycitein) showed similar trends to total isoflavones. Equol (a metabolite from daidzein) did not differ between the two groups.

The results of this study demonstrated that the isoflavones of aglycone-rich Fsoy were absorbed faster and in greater amounts than those of glucoside-rich Soy in postmenopausal Japanese women (Okabe et al., 2011).

Phytoestrogens and Breast Cancer; ER+/ER-, ER α /ER β

Dietary-derived Anti-angiogenic Compounds

Consumption of a plant-based diet can prevent the development and progression of chronic diseases that are associated with extensive neovascularization; however, little is known about the mechanisms. To determine whether prevention might be associated with dietary-derived angiogenesis inhibitors, the urine of healthy human subjects consuming a plant-based diet was fractionated and the fractions examined for their ability to inhibit the proliferation of vascular endothelial cells.

The isoflavonoid genistein was the most potent, and inhibited endothelial cell proliferation and in vitro angiogenesis at concentrations giving half-maximal inhibition of 5 and 150 microM, respectively. Genistein concentrations in urine of subjects consuming a plant-based diet are in the micromolar range, while those of subjects consuming a traditional Western diet are lower by a factor of > 30. The high excretion of genistein in urine of vegetarians and in addition to these results suggest that genistein may contribute to the preventive effect of a plant-based diet on chronic diseases, including solid tumors, by inhibiting neovascularization.

Thus, genistein may represent a member of a new class of dietary-derived anti-angiogenic compounds (Fotsis et al., 1993).

ERβ as a Down-regulator of ER+ Breast Cancer

The estrogen receptor (ER) isoform known as ERβ has become the focus of intense investigation as a potential drug target. The existence of clear-cut differences in ERβ and ERα expression suggests that tissues could be differentially targeted with ligands selective for either isoform (Couse et al., 1997; Enmark et al., 1997). In particular, the fact that ER β is widely expressed but not the primary estrogen receptor in, for example, the uterus (where estrogenic effects are mediated via ERα) (Harris, Katzenellenbogen, & Katzenellenbogen, 2002) opens up the possibility of targeting other tissues while avoiding certain classical estrogenic effects.

A major advance toward understanding how some phytoestrogens achieve modest ERβ selectivity was the X-ray structure determination of the ERβ ligand binding domain (LBD) complexed with genistein (GEN) (Pike et al., 1999), a 40-fold ERβ-selective ligand (Harris et al., 2002). This study clearly showed that there are only two residue substitutions in close proximity to GEN: ERα Leu384 is replaced by ER β Met336, and ERα Met421 is replaced by ER β Ile373.

ERbeta works as counter partner of ERalpha through inhibition of the transactivating function of ERalpha by heterodimerization, distinct regulation on several specific promoters by ERalpha or ERbeta, and ERbeta-specific regulated genes which are probably related to its anti-proliferative properties. Epidemiological studies of hormone replacement therapy and isoflavone (genistein) consumption indicate the possible contribution of ERbeta-specific signaling in breast cancer prevention. A selective estrogen receptor modulator, which works as an antagonist of ERalpha and an agonist of ERbeta, may be a promising chemo-preventive treatment (Saji, Hirose, & Toi, 2005).

Genistein and Apoptosis

The association between consumption of genistein containing soybean products and lower risk of breast cancer suggests a cancer chemo-preventive role for genistein. Consistent with this suggestion, exposing cultured human breast cancer cells to genistein inhibits cell proliferation, although this is not completely understood. To better understand how genistein works, the ability of genistein to induce apoptosis was compared in phenotypically dissimilar MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells that express the wild-type and mutant p53 gene, respectively.

After 6 days of incubation with 50 microM genistein, MCF-7, but not MDA-MB-231 cells, showed morphological signs of apoptosis. Marginal proteolytic cleavage of poly-(ADP-ribose)-polymerase and significant DNA fragmentation were also detected in MCF-7 cells.

In elucidating these findings, it was determined that after 2 days of incubation with genistein, MCF-7, but not MDA-MB-231 cells, had significantly higher levels of p53. Accordingly, the expression of certain proteins modulated by p53 was also studied. Levels of p21 increased in both of the genistein-treated cell lines, suggesting that p21 gene expression was activated but in a p53-independent manner; whereas no significant changes in levels of the pro-apoptotic protein, Bax, were found. In MCF-7 cells, levels of the anti-apoptotic protein, Bcl-2, decreased slightly at 18–24 hours but then increased considerably after 48 hours. Hence, the Bax:Bcl-2 ratio initially increased but later decreased.

Data suggests that at the concentration tested, MCF-7 cells, in contrast to MDA-MB-231 cells, were sensitive to the induction of apoptosis by genistein. However, the roles of Bax and Bcl-2 are unclear (Xu & Loo, 2001).

Genistein Derivatives and Breast Cancer Inhibition

Genistein binds to estrogen receptors and stimulates growth at concentrations that would be achieved by a high soy diet, but inhibits growth at high experimental concentrations.

The estrogen receptor (ER) is a major target for the treatment of breast cancer cells. Genistein, a soy isoflavone, possesses a structure similar to estrogen and can both mimic and antagonize estrogen effects although at high concentrations it inhibits breast cancer cell proliferation. Hence, to enhance the anti-cancer activity of Genistein at lower concentrations, seven structurally modified derivatives of Genistein based on the structural requirements for an optimal anti-cancer effect were synthesised. Among those seven, three derivatives showed high anti-proliferative activity with IC(50) levels in the range of 1-2.5 µM, i.e., at much lower concentrations range than Genistein itself, in three ER-positive breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7, 21PT and T47D) studied. In our analysis, we noticed that at IC(50) concentrations, the MA-6, MA-8 and MA-19 Genistein derivatives induced apoptosis, inhibited ER-α messenger RNA expression and increased the ratio of ER-β to ER-α levels in a manner comparable to that of the parent compound Genistein.

Of note, these three modified Genistein derivatives exerted their effects at concentrations 10–15 times lower than the parent compound, decreasing the likelihood of significant ER- α pathway activation, which has been a concern for Genistein. Hence these compounds might play a useful role in breast cancer chemoprevention (Marik et al., 2011).

Genistein and ER α

To determine the effects of low-dose, long-term genistein exposure MCF-7 breast cancer cells were cultured in 10nM genistein for 10-12 weeks and investigated whether or not this long-term genistein treatment (LTGT) altered the expression of estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) and the activity of the PI3-K/Akt signaling pathway. This is known to be pivotal in the signaling of mitogens such as oestradiol (E(2)), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and epidermal growth factor (EGF). LTGT significantly reduced the growth promoting effects of E(2) and increased the dose-dependent growth-inhibitory effect of the PI3-K inhibitor, LY 294002, compared to untreated control MCF-7 cells.

This was associated with a significant decreased protein expression of total Akt and phosphorylated Akt but not ERalpha. Rapamycin, an inhibitor of one of the downstream targets of Akt, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), also dose-dependently inhibited growth but the response to this drug was similar in LTGT and control MCF-7 cells. The protein expression of liver receptor homologue-1 (LRH1), an orphan nuclear receptor implicated in tumorigenesis was not affected by LTGT.

These results show that LTGT results in a down-regulation of the PI3-K/Akt signaling pathway and may be a mechanism through which genistein could offer protection against breast cancer (Anastasius et al., 2009).

Genistein and ER+/ER-

Genistein was found to cause a dose-dependent growth inhibition of the two hormone-sensitive cell lines T47D and ZR75.1 and of the two hormone-independent cell lines MDAMB-231 and BT20. Flow cytometric analysis of cells treated for 4 days with 15 and 30 M genistein showed a dose-dependent accumulation in the G2M phase of the cell-cycle. At the highest tested concentration, there was a 7-fold increase in the percentage of cells in G2M (63%) with respect to the control (9%) in the case of T47D cells and a 2.4-fold increase in the case of BT20. An intermediate 4-fold accumulation was observed in the case of MDAMB-231 and ZR75.1. The G2M arrest was coupled with a parallel depletion of the G0/G1 phase.

To understand the mechanism of action underlying the block in G2M induced by genistein, Cappelletti et al. (2000) investigated the expression and the activity of cyclins and of cyclin-dependent kinases specifically involved in the G2M transition. As expected, p34cdc-2 expression, monitored by Western blotting, was unaffected by genistein treatment in all cell lines. With the exception of the T47D cell line, we revealed an increase in the tyrosine phosphorylated form of p34, suggesting an inactivation of the p34cdc-2 catalytic activity consequent to treatment of cells with genistein. In fact, immunoprecipitates from genistein-treated MDAMB-231 and BT20 cells displayed a 4-fold decrease in kinase activity evaluated using the histone H1 as substrate.

Conversely, no variation in kinase activity was observed between treated and untreated ZR75.1 cells despite the increase in p34 phosphorylation. In cells treated with 30 M genistein, cyclin B1 (p62) increased 2.8-,8-and 103-fold, respectively, in BT20, MDAMB-231, and ZR75.1 cells, suggesting an accumulation of the p62, which is instead rapidly degraded in cycling cells. No effects were observed on cyclin expression in T47D cells.

We therefore conclude that genistein causes a G2M arrest in breast cancer cell lines, but that such growth arrest is not necessarily coupled with deregulation of the p34cdc-2/cyclin B1 complex only in all of the studied cell lines.

Genistein and ER+/ER-; MDR

Genistein is a potent inhibitor of the growth of the human breast carcinoma cell lines, MDA-468 (estrogen receptor negative), and MCF-7 and MCF-7-D-40 (estrogen receptor positive) (IC50 values from 6.5 to 12.0 µg/ml). The presence of the estrogen receptor is not required for the isoflavones to inhibit tumor cell growth (MDA-468 vs MCF-7 cells). In addition, the effects of genistein and biochanin A are not attenuated by over expression of the multi-drug resistance gene product (MCF-7-D40 vs MCF-7 cells (Peterson et al., 1991).

Studies have shown that genistein exerts multiple suppressive effects on both estrogen receptor positive (ER+) as well as estrogen receptor negative (ER-) human breast carcinoma lines suggesting that the mechanisms of these effects may be independent of ER pathways.

In the present study however Shao et al. (2000) provide evidence that in the ER+ MCF-7, T47D and 549 lines but not in the ER-MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 lines both presumed 'ER-dependent' and 'ER-independent' actions of genistein are mediated through ER pathways. Genistein's anti-proliferative effects are estrogen dependent in these ER+ lines, being more pronounced in estrogen-containing media and in the presence of exogenous 17-beta estradiol. Genistein also inhibits the expression of ER-downstream genes including pS2 and TGF-beta in these ER+ lines and this inhibition is also dependent on the presence of estrogen. Genistein inhibits estrogen-induced protein tyrosine kinase (PTK) activity. Genistein is only a weak transcriptional activator and actually decreases ERE-CAT levels induced by 17-beta estradiol in the ER+ lines.

Genistein also decreases steady state ER mRNA only in the presence of estrogen in the ER+ lines thereby manifesting another suppression of and through the ER pathway. Their observations resurrect the hypothesis that genistein functions as a 'good estrogen' in ER+ breast carcinomas. Since chemo-preventive effects of genistein would be targeted to normal ER-positive ductal-lobular cells of the breast, this 'good estrogen' action of genistein is most relevant to our understanding of chemoprevention.

Genistein and Concentration

The anti-proliferative activity of the isoflavones daidzein and genistein were investigated in three breast cancer cell lines with different patterns of estrogen receptor (ER) and c erbB 2 protein expression (ERα positive MCF 7 cells, c erbB 2 positive SK BR 3 cells and ERα/c erbB 2 positive ZR 75 1). After treatment at various concentrations (1 200 µM for 72 hours), the effect of daidzein and genistein on the proliferation of different cell types varied; these effects were found to be associated with ERα and c erbB 2 expression. Daidzein and genistein exhibited biphasic effects (stimulatory or inhibitory) on proliferation and ERα expression in MCF 7 cells. Although 1 µM daidzein significantly stimulated cell growth, ERα expression was unaffected. However, genistein showed marked increases in proliferation and ERα expression after exposure to <10 µM genistein.

Notably, the inhibition of cell proliferation by 200 µM genistein was greater compared to that by daidzein at the same concentration. Daidzein and genistein significantly inhibited proliferation of SK BR 3 and ZR 75 1 cells in a dose-dependent manner. In addition, ERα and c erbB 2 expression was reduced by daidzein and genistein in both SK BR 3 and ZR 75 1 cells in a dose-dependent manner. However, the effect of genistein was greater compared to that of daidzein.

In conclusion, the isoflavones daidzein and genistein showed anti breast cancer activity, which was associated with expression of the ERα and c erbB 2 receptors (Choi et al., 2013).

ER- α / ER β Receptors

Isoflavones are phytoestrogens that have been linked to both beneficial as well as adverse effects in relation to cell proliferation and cancer risks. The mechanisms that could be involved in this dualistic mode of action were investigated. One mechanism relates to the different ultimate cellular effects of activation of estrogen receptor (ER) α, promoting cell proliferation, and of ERβ, promoting apoptosis, with the major soy isoflavones genistein and daidzein activating especially ERβ.

A second mode of action includes the role of epigenetics, including effects of isoflavones on DNA methylation, histone modification and miRNA expression patterns. The overview presented reveals that we are only at the start of unraveling the complex underlying mode of action for effects of isoflavones, both beneficial or adverse, on cell proliferation and cancer risks. It is evident that whatever model system will be applied, its relevance to human tissues with respect to ERα and ERβ levels, co-repressor and co-activator characteristics as well as its relevance to human exposure regimens, needs to be considered and defined (Rietjens et al., 2013).

Genistein and ER+/ER-, ER- α / ER β Receptors

A novel mechanism of adipokine, adiponectin (APN) -mediated signaling that influences mammary epithelial cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis to modify breast cancer risk has been identified. It was demonstrated that early dietary exposure to soy protein isolate induced mammary tissue APN production without corresponding effects on systemic APN levels. In estrogen receptor (ER)-negative MCF-10A cells, recombinant APN promoted lobuloalveolar differentiation by inhibiting oncogenic signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 activity.

In ER-positive HC11 cells, recombinant APN increased ERβ expression, inhibited cell proliferation, and induced apoptosis. Using the estrogen-responsive 4X-estrogen response element promoter-reporter construct to assess ER transactivation and small interfering RNA targeting of ERα and ERβ, Rahal et al. (2011) show that APN synergized with the soy phytoestrogen genistein to promote ERβ signaling in the presence of estrogen (17β-estradiol) and ERβ-specific agonist 2,3-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)-propionitrile and to oppose ERα signaling in the presence of the ERα-specific agonist 4,4',4'-(4-propyl-(1H)-pyrazole-1,3,5-triyl)trisphenol.

The enhancement of ERβ signaling with APN + genistein co-treatments was associated with induction of apoptosis, increased expression of pro-apoptotic/prodifferentiation genes (Bad, p53, and Pten), and decreased anti-apoptotic (Bcl2 and survivin) transcript levels. These results suggest that mammary-derived APN can influence adjacent epithelial function by ER-dependent and ER-independent mechanisms that are consistent with reduction of breast cancer risk and suggest local APN induction by dietary factors as a targeted approach for promotion of breast health.

Genistein and Non-breast Cancer

Genistein Concentrations; Endometrial Cancer

The influence of two phytoestrogens (Genistein and Daidzein) on estrogen-related receptor-α in endometrial cancer cell line Ishikawa was investigated on the proliferation of the cells in this cell line. Ishikawa cells were incubated with different concentrations of Genistein and Daidzein (40, 20, 10, 5 µmol/L) for 24 hours or 48 hours, followed by Real-Time PCR for analyzing the expression of ERR-α mRNA in the cell line. MTT assay was then performed to evaluate the proliferation of Ishikawa cells.

The expression level of ERR-α mRNA in Ishikawa cells was higher than that of the control group after being dealt for 24 hours or 48 hours with Genistein, and the concentration 20 µmol/L was most effective. Nevertheless, this up-regulation was blocked when the cells were treated with 40 µmol/L Genistein. Lower concentration (5, 10 µmol/L) Genistein had depressant effect on proliferation of the cells, while higher concentrations (20, 40 µmol/L) had stimulant effect. After being treated with different concentrations of Daidzein, the expression of ERR- α mRNA in all experimental groups was significantly higher than that in the control group. In the 24 hour group, the concentration 40 µmol/L had most obvious effect; but in the 48 hour group, the concentration 20 µmol/L had most obvious effect, and this up-regulation was blocked when the concentration was elevated to 40 µmol/L.

Noticeably, all concentrations of Daidzein had depressant effect on the proliferation of Ishikawa cells in both 24 hour and 48 hour groups. In the 24 hour group, lower concentrations were more effective, but in the 48 hour group, concentration showed no significant effect. In lower concentrations, both Genistein and Daidzein have up-regulation effect on the expression of ERR-α, and block the proliferation of Ishikawa cells; but in higher concentrations, the up-regulation effect on ERR-α mRNA expression by these two phytoestrogens is not obvious. Genistein stimulates the proliferation of lshikawa cells in higher concentrations, while Daidzein suppresses the proliferation, especially in lower concentrations (Xin et al., 2009).

Genistein and VEGF; Ovarian Cancer

Genistein represses NF-kappaB (NF-κB), a pro-inflammatory transcription factor, and inhibits pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-6 in epithelial ovarian cancer. Additionally, it has been shown to stabilize p53 protein, sensitize TRAIL (TNF receptor apoptosis-inducing ligand) induce apoptosis, and prevent or delay chemotherapy-resistance. Recent studies further indicate that genistein potently inhibits VEGF production and suppresses ovarian cancer cell metastasis in vitro.

Based on widely published in vitro and mouse-model data, some anti-inflammatory phytochemicals appear to exhibit activity in modulating the tumor microenvironment. Specifically, apiegenin, baicalein, curcumin, EGCG, genistein, luteolin, oridonin, quercetin, and wogonin repress NF-kappaB (NF-κB, a pro-inflammatory transcription factor) and inhibit pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-6. Recent studies further indicate that apigenin, genistein, kaempferol, luteolin, and quercetin potently inhibit VEGF production and suppress ovarian cancer cell metastasis in vitro. Lastly, oridonin and wogonin were suggested to suppress ovarian CSCs as is reflected by down-regulation of the surface marker EpCAM (Chen, Michael, & Butler-Manuel, 2012).

Renal Cell Carcinoma, Prostate Cancer; Radiotherapy

The KCI-18 RCC cell line was generated from a patient with papillary renal cell carcinoma. Tumor cells metastasize from the primary renal tumor to the lungs, liver and mesentery mimicking the progression of RCC in humans. Treatment of established kidney tumors with genistein demonstrated a tendency to stimulate the growth of the primary kidney tumor and increase the incidence of metastasis to the mesentery lining the bowel. In contrast, when given in conjunction with kidney tumor irradiation, genistein significantly inhibited the growth and progression of established kidney tumors. These findings confirm the potentiation of radiotherapy by genistein in the orthotopic RCC model as previously shown in orthotopic models of prostate cancer. These studies in both RCC and prostate tumor models demonstrate that the combination of genistein with primary tumor irradiation is a more effective and safer therapeutic approach as the tumor growth and progression are inhibited both in the primary and metastatic sites (Gilda et al., 2007).

Cell-cycle Arrest

Genistein treatment increased Wee1 levels and decreased phospho-Wee1 (Ser 642). Moreover, genistein substantially decreased the Ser473 and Thr308 phosphorylation of Akt and up-regulated PTEN expression. Down-regulation of PTEN by siRNA in genistein-treated cells increased phospho-Wee1 (Ser642), whereas it decreased phospho-Cdc2 (Tyr15), resulting in decreased G2/M cell-cycle-arrest. Therefore, induction of G2/M cell-cycle arrest by genistein involved up-regulation of PTEN (Liu et al., 2013).

Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs)

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are cells that exist within a tumor with a capacity for self-renewal and an ability to differentiate, giving rise to heterogeneous populations of cancer cells. These cells are increasingly being implicated in resistance to conventional therapeutics and have also been implicated in tumor recurrence. Several cellular signaling pathways including Notch, Wnt, phosphoinositide-3-kinase-Akt-mammalian target of rapamycin pathways, and known markers such as CD44, CD133, CD166, ALDH, etc. have been associated with CSCs.

Here, we have reviewed our current understanding of self-renewal pathways and factors that help in the survival of CSCs with special emphasis on those that have been documented to be modulated by well characterized natural agents such as curcumin, sulforaphane, resveratrol, genistein, and epigallocatechin gallate (Dandawate et al., 2013).

Genistein and Sex Hormone-binding Globulin (SHBG)

Studies have indicated a correlation between a high level of urinary lignans and isoflavonoid phytoestrogens, particularly genistein, and a low incidence of hormone-dependent cancers, such as breast and prostate cancer. Previously it has been observed that a vegetarian diet is associated with high plasma levels of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), reducing clearance of sex hormones and probably risk of breast and prostate cancer. In the present study we investigated the in vitro effect of genistein on the production of SHBG by human hepatocarcinoma (Hep-G2) cells in culture and its effect on cell proliferation.

It has additionally been found that genistein not only significantly increases the SHBG production by Hep-G2 cells, but also suppresses the proliferation of those cancer cells already at a stage when SHBG production continues to be high. It is hence concluded that, in addition to the lignan enterolactone, the most abundant urinary isoflavonoid genistein stimulates SHBG production and inhibits Hep-G2 cancer cell proliferation (Mousavi et al., 1993).

Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1); Prostate Cancer

Elevated levels of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) are associated with an increased risk of several different cancers, including prostate cancer. Inhibition of IGF-1 and the downstream signaling pathways mediated by the activation of the IGF-1 receptor (IGF-1R) may be involved in inhibiting prostate carcinogenesis. Genistein treatment caused a significant inhibition of IGF-1-stimulated cell growth. Flow cytometry analysis revealed that genistein significantly decreased the number of IGF-1-stimulated cells in the G0/G1 phase of the cell-cycle. In IGF-1-treated cells, genistein effectively inhibited the phosphorylation of IGF-1R and the phosphorylation of its downstream targets, such as Src, Akt, and glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSk-3β). IGF-1 treatment decreased the levels of E-cadherin but increased the levels of β-catenin and cyclin D1.

However, genistein treatment greatly attenuated IGF-1-induced β-catenin signaling that correlated with increasing the levels of E-cadherin and decreasing cyclin D1 levels in PC-3 cells. In addition, genistein inhibited T-cell factor/lymphoid enhancer factor (TCF/LEF)-dependent transcriptional activity. These results showed that genistein effectively inhibited cell growth in IGF-1-stimulated PC-3 cells, possibly by inhibiting downstream of IGF-1R activation (Lee et al., 2012).

Sex Hormone-binding Globulin (SHBG); Hepatoma

Sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) is the main transport binding protein for sex steroid hormones in plasma and regulates their accessibility to target cells. Plasma SHBG is secreted by the liver under the control of hormones and nutritional factors. In the human hepatoma cell line (HepG2), thyroid and estrogenic hormones, and a variety of drugs including the anti-estrogen tamoxifen, the phytoestrogen, genistein and mitotane (Op'DDD) increase SHBG production and SHBG gene promoter activity. In contrast, monosaccharides (glucose or fructose) effectively decrease SHBG expression by inducing lipogenesis, which reduces hepatic HNF-4alpha levels, a transcription factor that plays a critical role in controlling the SHBG promoter. Interestingly, diminishing hepatic lipogenesis and free fatty acid liver biosynthesis also appear to be associated with the positive effects of thyroid hormones and PPARgamma antagonists on SHBG expression.

This mechanism provides a biological explanation for why SHBG is a sensitive biomarker of insulin resistance and the metabolic syndrome, and why low plasma SHBG levels are a risk factor for developing hyperglycemia and type 2 diabetes, especially in women (Pugeat et al., 2009).

Cancer: Pancreatic

Pancreatic cancer remains the fourth most common cause of cancer related death in the United States. Therefore, novel strategies for the prevention and treatment are urgently needed. Genistein is a prominent isoflavonoid found in soy products and has been proposed to be responsible for lowering the rate of pancreatic cancer in Asians. However, the molecular mechanism(s) by which genistein elicits its effects on pancreatic cancer cells has not been fully elucidated.

Wang et al., (2006) have previously shown that genistein induces apoptosis and inhibits the activation of nuclear factor kappaB (NF-kappaB) pathway. Moreover, Notch signaling is known to play a critical role in maintaining the balance between cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis, and thereby may contribute to the development of pancreatic cancer. Hence, in our study, they investigated whether there is any cross talk between Notch and NF-kappaB during genistein-induced apoptosis in BxPC-3 pancreatic cancer cells. They found that genistein inhibits cell growth and induces apoptotic processes in BxPC-3 pancreatic cancer cells.

This was partly due to inhibition of Notch-1 activity. BxPC-3 cells transfected with Notch-1 cDNA showed induction of NF-kappaB activity, and this was inhibited by genistein treatment. From these results, we conclude that the inhibition of Notch-1 and NF-kappaB activity and their cross talk provides a novel mechanism by which genistein inhibits cell growth and induces apoptotic processes in pancreatic cancer cells.

References

Anastasius N, Boston S, Lacey M, Storing N, Whitehead SA. (2009). Evidence that low-dose, long-term genistein treatment inhibits oestradiol-stimulated growth in MCF-7 cells by down-regulation of the PI3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol, 116(1-2):50-55.


Cappelletti V, Fioravanti L, Miodini P, Di Fronzo G J. (2000). Genistein blocks breast cancer cells in the G2M phase of the cell-cycle. Cell. Biochem, 79(4):594-600. doi: 10.1002/1097-4644(20001215)79:4<594::AID-JCB80>3.0.CO;2-4.


Chen SS, Michael A, Butler-Manuel SA. (2012). Advances in the treatment of ovarian cancer: a potential role of anti-inflammatory phytochemicals. Discov Med, 13(68):7-17.


Choi EJ, Kim GH. (2013). Anti-proliferative activity of daidzein and genistein may be related to ERα /c-erbB-2 expression in human breast cancer cells. Mol Med Rep, 7(3):781-4. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2013.1283.


Couse JF, Lindzey J, Grandien K, Gustafsson JA, Korach KS. (1997). Tissue distribution and quantitative analysis of estrogen receptor-alpha (ERalpha) and estrogen receptor-beta (ERbeta) messenger ribonucleic acid in the wild-type and ERalpha-knockout mouse. Endocrinology, 138(1997):4613–4621


Dandawate P, Padhye S, Ahmad A, Sarkar FH. (2013). Novel strategies targeting cancer stem cells through phytochemicals and their analogs. Drug Deliv Transl Res, 3(2):165-182.


Enmark E, Peltohuikko M, Grandien K, et al. (1997). Human estrogen receptor beta-gene structure, chromosomal localization, and expression pattern. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab, 82(1997):4258–4265.


Fotsis T, Pepper M, Adlercreutz H, et al. (1993). Genistein, a dietary-derived inhibitor of in vitro angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 90(7):2690-4.


Harris HA, Albert LM, Leathurby Y, et al. (2002). Evaluation of an estrogen receptor- β agonist in animal models of human disease. Endocrinology, 144(2003):4241–4249


Harris HA, Katzenellenbogen JA, Katzenellenbogen BS. (2002). Characterization of the biological roles of the estrogen receptors, ER alpha and ER beta, in estrogen target tissues in vivo through the use of an ER alpha-selective ligand. Endocrinology, 143(2002):4172–4177.


Hillman GG, Wang Y, Che M, et al. (2007). Progression of renal cell carcinoma is inhibited by genistein and radiation in an orthotopic model. BMC Cancer, 7:4. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-7-4.


Lee J, Ju J, Park S, et al. (2012). Inhibition of IGF-1 Signaling by Genistein: Modulation of E-Cadherin Expression and Down-regulation of β -Catenin Signaling in Hormone Refractory PC-3 Prostate Cancer Cells. Nutrition and Cancer, 64(1). doi:10.1080/01635581.2012.630161


Liu YL, Zhang GQ, Yang Y, et al. (2013). Genistein Induces G2/M Arrest in Gastric Cancer Cells by Increasing the Tumor Suppressor PTEN Expression. Nutr Cancer.


Marik R, Allu M, Anchoori R, et al. (2011). Potent genistein derivatives as inhibitors of estrogen receptor alpha-positive breast cancer. Cancer Biol Ther, 11(10):883-92.


Mousavi Y, Adlercreutz H. (1993). Genistein is an effective stimulator of sex hormone-binding globulin production in hepatocarcinoma human liver cancer cells and suppresses proliferation of these cells in culture. Steroids, 58(7):301-4.


Okabe Y, Shimazu T, Tanimoto H. (2011). Higher bioavailability of isoflavones after a single ingestion of aglycone-rich fermented soybeans compared with glucoside-rich non-fermented soybeans in Japanese postmenopausal women. J Sci Food Agric, 91(4):658-63. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.4228.


Peterson G, Barnes S. (1991). Genistein inhibition of the growth of human breast cancer cells: independence from estrogen receptors and the multi-drug resistance gene. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 179(1):661-667. doi:10.1016/0006-291X(91)91423-A.


Pike ACW, Brzozowski AM, Hubbard RE, et al. (1999). Structure of the ligand-binding domain of oestrogen receptor beta in the presence of a partial agonist and a full antagonist. EMBO J, 18(1999): 4608–4618


Pugeat M, Nader N, Hogeveen K, et al. (2010). Sex hormone-binding globulin gene expression in the liver: Drugs and the metabolic syndrome. Mol Cell Endocrinol, 316(1):53-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2009.09.020.


Rahal OM, Simmen RC. (2011). Paracrine-Acting Adiponectin Promotes Mammary Epithelial Differentiation and Synergizes with Genistein to Enhance Transcriptional Response to Estrogen Receptor β Signaling. Endocrinology, 152(9):3409-21. doi: 10.1210/en.2011-1085.


Rietjens IM, Sotoca AM, Vervoort J, Louisse J. (2013). Mechanisms underlying the dualistic mode of action of major soy isoflavones in relation to cell proliferation and cancer risks. Mol Nutr Food Res, 57(1):100-13. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201200439.


Rowland IR, Wiseman H, Sanders TA, Adlercreutz H, Bowey EA. (2000). Interindividual variation in metabolism of soy isoflavones and lignans: influence of habitual diet on equol production by the gut microflora. Nutr Cancer, 36(1):27-32.


Saji S, Hirose M, Toi M. (2005). Clinical significance of estrogen receptor beta in breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 56(1):21-6.


Setchell KD, Brown NM, Summer S, et al. (2013). Dietary Factors Influence Production of the Soy Isoflavone Metabolite S-(-)Equol in Healthy Adults. J Nutr.


Shao ZM, Shen ZZ, Fontana JA, Barsky SH. (2000). Genistein's ER-dependent and independent actions are mediated through ER pathways in ER-positive breast carcinoma cell lines. Anti-cancer Res, 20(4):2409-16.


Stark A, Madar Z. (2002). Phytoestrogens: a review of recent findings. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab, 15(5):561-72.


Tseng M, Byrne C, Kurzer MS, Fang CY. (2013). Equol-producing status, isoflavone intake, and breast density in a sample of u.s. Chinese women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 22(11):1975-83. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0593.


Xin Z, Siji L, Yan D, Weijuan X, Jie S, Qianyu W. (2009). Influence of Genistein and Daidzein on estrogen-related receptor- α in an Endometrial Carcinoma Cell Line. Tong Ji Da Xue Xue Bao (Yi Xue Ban), 30(4): 12-17.


Xu J, Loo G. (2001). Different effects of genistein on molecular markers related to apoptosis in two phenotypically dissimilar breast cancer cell lines. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, 82(1), 78-88.

Wang Z, Zhang Y, Banerjee S, Li Y, Sarkar FH. (2006) Inhibition of nuclear factor kappab activity by genistein is mediated via Notch-1 signaling pathway in pancreatic cancer cells. Int J Cancer. 2006 Apr 15;118(8):1930-6.

Honokiol (See also Injectables)

Cancer:
Lung, breast, prostate, leukemia, colorectal., esophageal., ovarian, myeloma, pancreatic, stomach, uterine

Action: Anti-angiogenic, chemo-sensitizer, multi-drug resistance reversal., anti-inflammatory, anxiolytic, anti-depressant, inhibits VEGF, anti-metastatic, synergistic effects with other cancer treatments

Honokiol is a phenolic compound purified from plants of the Magnolia genus, including Magnolia officinalis (Rehder & Wilson) and Magnolia grandiflora (L.), that exhibits anti-cancer effects in experimental models with various types of cancer cells, including esophageal., ovarian, breast, and lung cancer, as well as myeloma and leukemia. It is speculated that this compound causes cancer cell death in part through targeting mitochondria (Munroe et al., 2007; Chen et al., 2009; Fried & Arbiser, 2009).

Inhibits Angiogenesis, MDR, Anti-inflammatory, Inhibits VEGF

Honokiol is one of two dominant biphenolic compounds isolated from Magnolia spp. bark, and is the most widely researched active constituent of the bark. In vivo studies suggest that honokiol's greatest value is in its multiple anti-cancer actions. In vitro research suggests honokiol has potential to enhance current anti-cancer regimens by inhibiting angiogenesis, promoting apoptosis, providing direct cytotoxic activity, down-regulating cancer cell signaling pathways, regulating genetic expression, enhancing the effects of specific chemotherapeutic agents, radio-sensitizing cancer cells to radiation therapy, and inhibiting multi-drug resistance.

Honokiol also shows potential in preventive health by reducing inflammation and oxidative stress, providing neurological protection, and regulating glucose; in mental illness by its effects against anxiety and depression; and in helping regulate stress response signaling. Its anti-microbial effects demonstrate potential for partnering with anti-viral/antibiotic therapy, and treating secondary infections.

Honokiol may occupy a distinct therapeutic niche because of its unique characteristics: the ability to cross the blood brain barrier (BBB) and blood cerebrospinal fluid barrier (BCSFB), high systemic bioavailability, and its actions on a multiplicity of signaling pathways and genomic activity. There is a need for research on honokiol to progress to human studies and on into clinical use.

The preclinical research on honokiol's broad-ranging capabilities shows its potential as a therapeutic compound for numerous solid and hematological cancers, including its effectiveness in combating multi-drug resistance (MDR) and its synergy with other anti-cancer therapies. Research thus far shows no toxicity or serious adverse effects in animal models.

Honokiol has also been shown to inhibit spread of cancer cells through the lymph system by inhibiting one of the primary pathways involved in growth stimulation related to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (Wen et al., 2009).

Inhibits Angiogenesis, Gastric Cancer

A 2012 in vivo study in PLoS One showed that honokiol, by inhibiting angiogenic pathways such as STAT-3, dampened peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer in mice (5 mg/kg delivered intraperitoneally) (Liu et al., 2012).    

Induces Apoptosis; Leukemia

Honokiol induces cell apoptosis in several cell lines, such as leukemia cell lines HL-60, colon cancer cell lines RKO, lung cancer cell lines A549 and CH27 (Hirano et al., 1994; Wang et al., 2004; Hibasami et al., 1998; Konoshima et al., 1991;Yang et al., 2002; Kong et al., 2005). It also has remarkable in vivo anti-tumor activities in tumor mouse models (Bai et al., 2003). Honokiol has demonstrated potent anti-angiogenic and anti-tumor properties against aggressive angiosarcoma by blocking of VEGF-induced VEGF receptor 2 autophosphorylation (Konoshima et al., 1991; Yang et al., 2002).

MDR

Honokiol has also been found to down-regulate the expression of P-glycoprotein at mRNA and protein levels in MCF-7/ADR, a human breast MDR cancer cell line. The down-regulation of P-glycoprotein is accompanied with a partial recovery of the intracellular drug accumulation (Xu et al., 2006).

Prostate Cancer

In addition, it has been shown that prostate cancer cells that failed to respond to hormone withdrawal responded to honokiol-induced apoptosis. It was found to significantly induce death in cells surrounding primary and metastatic prostate cancers, the prostate stromal fibroblasts, marrow stromal cells, and bone marrow-associated endothelial cells. Honokiol is hence a promising nontoxic agent that could be used as an adjuvant with low-dose docetaxel for the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer and its distant bone metastases (Shigemura et al., 2007).

Anti-metastatic

Honokiol inhibited the activity of MMP-9, which may be responsible, in part, for the inhibition of tumor cell invasiveness (Nagase et al., 2001).

Breast Cancer

The development of more targeted and low toxic drugs from traditional Chinese medicines for breast cancer are needed due to most of the anti-breast cancer drugs often being limited because of drug resistance and serious adverse reactions. Results have shown that honokiol inhibited the rate of breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cell growth (Nagalingam et al., 2012).

Synergistic Effects with Other Cancer Treatments

One of the most promising benefits of honokiol is its ability to synergize with other cancer treatments. Clinical trials are desperately needed to validate the potential synergy that has been demonstrated in vitro and in vivo.

Chemotherapy

• A 2013 in vitro study published in the International Journal of Oncology showed that honokiol synergized chemotherapy drugs in Multi-drug-resistant breast cancer (Tian et al., 2013). A 2011 in vitro study published in PLoS One found that honokiol enhanced the apoptotic effects of the anti-cancer drug gemcitabine against pancreatic cancer (Arora et al., 2011).

• In vivo research published in Oncology Letters in 2011 found honokiol enhanced the action of cisplatin against colon cancer (Cheng et al., 2011).

• A 2010 in vitro study from the Journal of Biological Regulators and Homeostatic Agents showed that honokiol resensitized cancer cells to doxorubicin in Multi-drug-resistant uterine cancer (Angelini et al., 2010).

• A 2010 in vitro study published in Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods showed honokiol performed synergistically with the drug imatinib against human leukemia cells (Wang et al., 2010).

• 2008 in vivo research published in the International Journal of Gynecological Cancer showed honokiol to potentiate the activity of cisplatin in murine models of ovarian cancer (Liu et al., 2008).

• 2005 in vitro research published in Blood showed honokiol enhanced the cytotoxicity induced by fludarabine, cladribine, and chlorambucil, indicating it is a potent inducer of apoptosis in B-CLL cells (Battle et al., 2005).

Radiation treatment

• 2012 in vitro research published in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics showed that honokiol was able to sensitize cancer cells to radiation treatments (Ponnurangam et al., 2012).

• A 2011 in vitro study published in American Journal of Physiology Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology showed honokiol sensitized treatment-resistant colon cancer cells to radiation therapy (He et al., 2011).

Inhibition of multi-drug resistance

Honokiol has been shown to interact with genes that are involved with mechanisms of drug efflux, thus reversing MDR in experimental models. The exact mechanisms of action in this regard are thought to be related to effects of blocking of NF-kB activity, but other mechanisms may also be involved (Xu et al., 2006).

References

Angelini A, Di Ilio C, Castellani ML, Conti P, Cuccurullo F. (2010). Modulation of Multi-drug resistance p-glycoprotein activity by flavonoids and honokiol in human doxorubicin-resistant sarcoma cells (MES-SA/DX-5): Implications for natural sedatives as chemosensitizing agents in cancer therapy. Journal of Biological Regulators & Homeostatic Agents, 24(2). 197-205.


Arora S, Bhardwaj A, Srivastava SK, et al. (2011). Honokiol arrests Cell-cycle, induces apoptosis, and potentiates the cytotoxic effect of gemcitabine in human pancreatic cancer cells. PLoS One, 6(6), e21573. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021573.


Bai X, Cerimele F, Ushio-Fukai M, et al. (2003). Honokiol, a small molecular weight natural product, inhibits angiogenesis in vitro and tumor growth in vivo. J Biol Chem, 278: 35501–7.


Battle TE, Arbiser J, Frank DA. (2005). The natural product honokiol induces caspase-dependent apoptosis in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL) cells. Blood, 106(2), 690-697.


Chen G, Izzo J, Demizu Y, et al. (2009). Different redox states in malignant and nonmalignant esophageal epithelial cells and differential cytotoxic responses to bile acid and honokiol. Antioxid. Redox Signal., 11(5):1083–1095


Cheng N, Xia T, Han Y, et al. (2001). Synergistic anti-tumor effects of liposomal honokiol combined with cisplatin in colon cancer models. Oncology Letters, 2(5), 957-962.


Eliaz I. (2013). Honokiol research review: A promising extract with multiple applications. Natural Medicine Journal., 5(7).


Fried LE, Arbiser JL. (2009). Honokiol, a multifunctional anti-angiogenic and anti-tumor agent. Antioxid. Redox Signal., 1(5):1139–1148. doi: 10.1089/ARS.2009.2440.


He Z, Subramaniam D, Ramalingam S, et al. (2011). Honokiol radiosensitizes colorectal cancer cells: enhanced activity in cells with mismatch repair defects. American Journal of Physiology: Gastrointest and Liver Physiology, 301(5):G929-937.


Hibasami H, Achiwa Y, Katsuzaki H, et al. (1998). Honokiol induces apoptosis in human lymphoid leukemia Molt 4B cells. Int J Mol Med, 2:671–3.


Hirano T, Gotoh M, Oka K. (1994). Natural flavonoids and lignans are potent cytostatic agents against human leukemic HL-60 cells. Life Sci, 55:1061–9.


Hou X, Yuan X, Zhang B, Wang S, Chen Q. (2013). Screening active anti-breast cancer compounds from Cortex Magnolia officinalis by 2D LC-MS. J Sep Sci, 36(4):706-12. doi: 10.1002/jssc.201200896.


Kong ZL, Tzeng SC, Liu YC. (2005). Cytotoxic neolignans: an SAR study. Bioorg Med Chem Lett, 15: 163–6.


Konoshima T, Kozuka M, Tokuda H, et al. (1991). Studies on inhibitors of skin tumor promotion. IX. Neolignans from Magnolia officinalis. J Nat Prod, 54: 816–22.


Liu Y, Chen L, He X, et al. (2010). Enhancement of therapeutic effectiveness by combining liposomal honokiol with cisplatin in ovarian carcinoma. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 18(4), 652-659.


Liu SH, Wang KB, Lan KH, et al. (2012). Calpain/SHP-1 interaction by honokiol dampening peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer in nu/nu mice. PLoS One, 7(8):e43711.


Munroe ME, Arbiser JL, Bishop GA. (2007). Honokiol, a natural plant product, inhibits inflammatory signals and alleviates inflammatory arthritis. J. Immunol., 179(2):753–763


Nagalingam A, Arbiser JL, Bonner MY, Saxena NK, Sharma D. (2012). Honokiol activates AMP-activated protein kinase in breast cancer cells via an LKB1-dependent pathway and inhibits breast carcinogenesis. Breast Cancer Research, 14:R35 doi:10.1186/bcr3128


Nagase H, Ikeda K, Sakai Y. (2001). Inhibitory Effect of Magnolol and Honokiol from Magnolia obovata on Human Fibrosarcoma HT-1080 Invasiveness in vitro. Planta Med, 67(8): 705-708. DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-18345


Ponnurangam S, Mammen JM, Ramalingam S, et al. (2012). Honokiol in combination with radiation targets notch signaling to inhibit colon cancer stem cells. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, 11(4), 963-972. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043711.


Shigemura K, Arbiser JL, Sun SY, et al. (2007). Honokiol, a natural plant product, inhibits the bone metastatic growth of human prostate cancer cells. Cancer, 109(7), 1279-1289.


Tian W, Deng Y, Li L, et al. (2013). Honokiol synergizes chemotherapy drugs in Multi-drug-resistant breast cancer cells via enhanced apoptosis and additional programmed necrotic death. International Journal of Oncology, 42(2), 721-732. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2012.1739.


Wang Y, Yang Z, Zhao X. (2010). Honokiol induces parapoptosis and apoptosis and exhibits schedule-dependent synergy in combination with imatinib in human leukemia cells. Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods, 20(5), 234-241. doi: 10.3109/15376511003758831.


Wang T, Chen F, Chen Z, et al. (2004). Honokiol induces apoptosis through p53-independent pathway in human colorectal cell line RKO. World J Gastroenterol, 10: 2205–8.


Wen J, Fu AF, Chen LJ, et al. (2009). Liposomal honokiol inhibits VEGF-D-induced lymphangiogenesis and metastasis in xenograft tumor model. International Journal of Cancer, 124(11), 2709-2718. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24244.


Xu D, Lu Q, Hu X. (2006). Down-regulation of P-glycoprotein expression in MDR breast cancer cell MCF-7/ADR by honokiol. Cancer Letters, 243(2), 274-280.


Yang SE, Hsieh MT, Tsai TH, Hsu SL. (2002). Down-modulation of Bcl-XL, release of cytochrome c and sequential activation of caspases during honokiol-induced apoptosis in human squamous lung cancer CH27 cells. Biochemical Pharmacology, 63(9), 1641-1651.

Source

Eliaz I. (2013). Honokiol research review: A promising extract with multiple applications. Natural Medicine Journal., 5(7). Retrieved from http://www.naturalmedicinejournal.com/article_content.asp?edition=1.